2. Consider the lecture on Trifles, and this question particularly: “What constitutes a crime and under what circumstances? That is, what’s the crime at hand . . . The legal crime, or the emotional one?
Trifles raises several interesting questions, a major one dealing with the issue of crimes and violence. It is clear that John Wright was at the least mentally abusive towards his wife Minnie, if not so physically. The fact that he killed her canary by breaking its neck points out that he may in fact have been physically abusive, but this is not proven. While Minnie did commit a crime in that she murdered her husband, a legal crime, spousal abuse and domestic violence were not considered legal – or even emotional – crimes at the time of the play’s conception. Glaspell seems to be making a point in this vein. While today women can use an affirmative defense in cases against their husbands or partners, this kind of violence towards women was in many ways status quo in the Midwest during the early 20th century. Unfortunately, there is no way to prove an emotional crime to defend Minnie’s actions against her husband, but that emotional crime was the underlying cause of John Wright’s death.
4. The play relies primarily on symbolism and some foreshadowing to develop the plot. Which elements are symbolic? How do you know?
Glaspell uses several images in Trifles. These symbolic images include the canned fruit, the unfinished quilt, the dead canary, and its broken cage. Probably the most obvious symbolism is the canary. Mrs. Hale recalls Minnie Foster singing in the town choir as a carefree young woman before she became Mrs. Wright. Canaries are known for their song and the correlation of Mr. Wright killing the canary with Mr. Wright killing Minnie’s spirit is an easy one to make. It is also easy to connect the bird’s broken neck with the manner in which Mr. Wright died. This brings up the next symbolic element in the play: the unfinished quilt. Quilts can either be knotted or quilted in order to attach the top, batting, and backing. When Mrs. Hale and Mrs. Peters note that the quilt was going to be knotted, they are making an allusion to the knot in the noose that killed Mr. Wright. At the first mention of knotting, the women seem to answer the question innocently and with no other connotation. But when the men ask again at the end of the play, Mrs. Hale’s reply carries a much more knowing tone. The women have figured out what happened and their answer is a veiled admission of this fact. Mrs. Wright’s canned fruits froze and burst in their jars when the fire in the kitchen stove went out over night. There are several symbolic elements to be taken from this observation; the first being that the fire went out. Fire is equated with passion and desire, and it can be said that Minnie’s desire to stay in her marriage had been extinguished when her husband killed her canary, her source of light and happiness. And just as the fruit burst, so did Minnie when she strangled her husband. The fact that only one jar remains could symbolize the need the other women feel to protect Minnie, to keep her from completely bursting and losing everything. These images are fairly obvious from a literary standpoint because they are easy to decode, but Glaspell links them to the reader through the title of her play. The men laugh at the wives for being concerned with ‘trifles’, but it is these ‘trivial’ details that uncover the truth that the men are unable to pinpoint.
Wednesday, October 14, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Unbelievable symbolic imagery analysis! I wish I could decode it as well as you have here. The singing canary to Mrs. Wrights singing in the choir, the fire going out, and the knots throughout were once oblivious to me. Great post! Its nice to read someone else's and get some good ideas!
ReplyDeleteThanks Rachel!
ReplyDeleteI've read this play a LOT, my mom quilts, and I had a nutso AP Lit teacher my senior year of high school so I kind of lucked out with this blog ;)
Hello Miss Leslie,
ReplyDeleteHow are you? I hope that you are well, and that you had a good weekend. I also hope that you have a good week ahead! :-) Great posting! I very much enjoyed reading it. I would like to comment on question number four. :-)
Discussion Question Number Four:
Yes, I very much agree, Leslie! The largest symbolic connection that I also made in the play was the dead canary to Minnie's own life being extinguished. In "A Jury of Her Peers," Mrs. Hale explains to Mrs. Peters how Minnie Foster was just like a sweet little bird, but then changed: "She -- come to think of it, she was kind of like a bird herself. Real sweet and pretty, but kind of timid and -- fluttery. How -- she -- did -- change" (Glaspell 275). Later on in the story, they find the dead bird: ""It's the bird," she whispered.
"But, Mrs. Peters!" cried Mrs. Hale. "Look at it! Its neck -- look at its neck! It's all -- other side to."
She held the box away from her.
The sheriff's wife again bent closer.
"Somebody wrung its neck," said she, in a voice that was slow and deep" (Glaspell 276).
Lastly, earlier on in the story, Mrs. Hale and Mrs. Peters talk about how strange it was the way that John Wright died:
For a moment Mrs. Hale had no answer. Then, "Well, I guess John Wright didn't wake up -- when they was slippin' that rope under his neck," she muttered.
"No, it's strange," breathed Mrs. Peters. "They think it was such a -- funny way to kill a man" (Glaspell 269).
It is clear, from both of the stories, that the canary is an important symbolic image in the plotline. Minnie probably dearly loved the bird, as it brought her the only happiness in her life, and then when John killed it by breaking his neck, Minnie was probably devastated and her life left her. This could be another reason why she never finished any of her household chores and why her house never felt welcoming. Therefore, I do not find it surprising that John Wright was killed the same way because she never forgave him for killing her beloved bird that way, so she killed him the same way he killed her sweet bird that brought her happiness. To me, this was the largest symbolic image in the stories. I love how you also pointed out the other ones as well; they are also extremely important in analyzing a story as emotionally complex as this one.
Thanks so much for the read, Leslie! Have a great week ahead, and God Bless! :-)
Sincerely,
Jillian
I really enjoyed your analysis of the symbols in the story. You made it so each one led to something else of important symbolism. Most of it was obvious to me, but you really zoned in on all the details.
ReplyDelete