Sunday, August 30, 2009

In the story Rose for Emily the author William Faulkner makes no direct mention of a rose, nor is there an indirect reference of a rose. So the rose is a figurative rose. There are many things can be considered a rose. Emily’s beau can be considered a rose. The rose could also be her family name The Griersons. Although these could be considered “roses”, the answer may be simpler than that. The story itself is the rose for Emily. Not much is known about Emily, nor the Griersons as time has passed.
The story is pieced together from what the townspeople know of her. She came from a noble family and considered herself very esteemed. Since the truth will never be known about Emily, the rumors and tidbits of information from the community portray her life and who she was. Compiling these tidbits of information about Emily creates a story. A story that future generations will read and remember who Emily Grierson was. This story ensures that her memory will never die and that she will be remembered. The perfect rose to rest on someone’s grave.

According to the text Rose for Emily proof can be actualized that mentally ill and/or mentally disturbed individuals are capable of loving. While Emily was never formally diagnosed it was clear she had some issues. She loved her beau so much that instead of risking him leaving and never returning she would rather him stay at home in a more permanent status.
She definitely loved him or else she would not have devoted herself to going to town to purchase the things she thought he should have. Purchasing gifts is one thing, but getting a recluse to emerge from their dwelling into the public to buy presents requires love or else they wouldn’t be a recluse.
These examples from the short story are the proof the story offers that mentally disturbed people are capable of love. Even though her disturbed mind superseded her love for her beau it doesn’t deny that there was love to begin with.

2 comments:

  1. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I agree with you that Emily was not formally diagnosed for her state of mind. Emily may have portrayed some acts that are not normal in our standards but who and what defines "true and real" love should be? On the contrary, I can tell by her actions of holding on to Homer even after his death could also mean that she is scared of being alone. Homer is her first admirer after his father's death and I think because Emily is so used to having a father around to take care of things for her, Homer becomes handy to be the "father figure". She and Homer ride the buggy on Sunday afternoons, just like she and her father used to do when he was alive. I do not think that there was no love to begin with and there is no mention of Homer or Emily being in love with each other. The narrator only describes Homer as an "interests" and not a "lover". I am not convinced that Emily is mentally disturbed although her actions speaks loudly that she is.

    ReplyDelete